ArticleProgress in orthodontics2025
Analyzing how personality factors influence the perception of smile aesthetics across diverse dental educational backgrounds and lay audiences.
Article in Progress in orthodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study examined the relationship between smile aesthetics perception and personality factors among individuals with varying dental education backgrounds. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis cross-sectional study included 412 participants categorized into four groups: pre-clinical dental students, clinical dental students, practicing dentists, and laypeople. Participants rated 20 photographs depicting variations in maxillary midline diastema, central incisor crown length, smile arc, gingival display, and incisal plane cant on a ten-point attractiveness scale. Personality factors were assessed using the NEO-FFI questionnaire, measuring Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness.
resultsDental professionals assigned significantly lower aesthetic scores to smiles with a 2.0 mm central incisor crown reduction, a 4.0 mm gingival display increase, and an incisal plane cant compared to non-dental raters (P < .05). Higher Agreeableness and Conscientiousness scores were associated with a preference for smiles without midline diastema (r = .118, 0.112; P = .017, 0.023). Higher Extraversion and Openness scores were associated with a preference for no gingival display (r = .147, 0.123; P = .003, 0.012).
conclusionsPerceptions of smile aesthetics varied significantly between dental and non-dental raters. Severity of smile discrepancy has a predictive role in aesthetic preferences, influencing the perceived attractiveness of specific smile characteristics. Personality factors had some associations with the perceived attractiveness of specific smile characteristics. Understanding how severity of smile discrepancy, personality traits and dental training influence esthetic preferences can help clinicians better tailor smile design and treatment communication to individual patient expectations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.