ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2025
From library to landscape: integrative annotation workflows for compound libraries in drug repurposing.
Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A host-centric morphological profiling approach to identify repurposed antiviral drugs.iScience · 2026Article
- Experimental and machine learning-based exploration of repurposed drugs reveals chemical features underlying phospholipidosis.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Enabling multi-target drug discovery through latent evolutionary optimization and synthesis-aware prioritization (EVOSYNTH).Communications chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the rapidly advancing landscape of drug discovery and repurposing, efficient access and integration of chemical and bioactivity data from public repositories have become essential. To address this need, we developed two complementary annotation pipelines (KNIME- and Python-based) that automate the extraction and integration of curated chemical and bioactivity data from public repositories. These pipelines support any user-provided compound library, enabling reproducible workflows that integrate data from heterogeneous sources such as ChEMBL and PubChem. As part of the REMEDi4ALL project, with the aim of establishing a European platform for drug repurposing, we validated our framework using a harmonized subset of the Specs repurposing collection, which includes >5000 compounds available at the partner institutes. We also developed two interactive dashboards that support multilayered analyses and visualization by integrating chemical properties, bioactivity profiles, and relational data. Our results demonstrate that this framework streamlines the collection of harmonized data and facilitates analyses that are critical for drug repurposing efforts, while remaining versatile for broader applications in drug discovery. Moreover, the analysis of the annotations reveals that the Specs subset includes chemical scaffolds representative of a significant portion of approved drugs and compounds undergoing clinical evaluation, underscoring its potential as a rich source of drug repurposing candidates. Both pipeline protocols are publicly available online, and the dashboards are open access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.