ArticleEnvironmental entomology2026
Predicting Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) populations in the southern United States.
Article in Environmental entomology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Forecasting insect pest populations before crops are planted can help improve management and reduce pesticide use. Pests with long dispersal potentials and wide host ranges are difficult to predict but often cause losses in crops across broad spatial scales. Here, we use corn earworm, Helicoverpa zea Boddie (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), as a case study of a regional crop pest to develop a forecasting framework. Models used historical H. zea trap data to predict populations across 12 states in the southern United States. Three regression models and one machine learning model were used to evaluate predictive performance in either space or time (ie year over year): linear regression model with fixed-effects only, Bayesian spatial-intercept model with and without fixed effects, and random forest. Results of random forest model provided the most useful information about H. zea population dynamics. We found that the location and year of trap location was the most meaningful predictor of H. zea abundance. The importance of local host crop abundance was less meaningful than the prior predictors. We also tested the importance of trap density to recover forecasting signals in North Carolina. Results showed that the trap density could be reduced by approximately 25% while still recovering reasonable predictions of H. zea density. However, it is clear from prior work that some trap locations are more important for prediction, so further assessment of the specific roles individual trap nodes present would be useful. Together this study highlights opportunities to improve annual H. zea forecasting across the US Cotton Belt.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.