ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025
The Long-Term Absence of Static Stereopsis Cultivates Adaptive Planning of Reaching-to-Grasp.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To determine how the absence of stereopsis affects sensorimotor adaptation in visually guided reaching-to-grasp by comparing slant perception and depth-directed motor control between adults with long-term stereoblindness and typically sighted adults. Methods: Twenty-four adults (12 stereoblind, 12 typically sighted) completed a slant-matching task (perceptual estimate of surface orientation) and a reaching-to-grasp task (motor execution in depth). Outcomes indexed perceptual accuracy and grasp kinematics, including approach speed and the timing of grip alignment to surface slant. Results: Groups performed comparably on slant matching, but the stereoblind group adopted distinct grasping strategies, characterized by a faster approach to the target and delayed grip alignment relative to controls. Conclusions: Findings indicate adaptive reorganization of motor planning following long-term deprivation of static binocular (disparity) cues. The visuomotor system appears to recalibrate the balance between feedforward and feedback control-placing greater weight on real-time sensory information when anticipatory planning is constrained-highlighting flexible, ecological pathways for development and adaptation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.