Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41363831›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2025

Doubly Robust Estimation and Sensitivity Analysis With Outcomes Truncated by Death in Multi-Arm Clinical Trials.

Jiaqi Tong, Chao Cheng, Guangyu Tong, Michael O Harhay, Fan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Principal stratification with U-statistics under principal ignorability.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jiaqi TongDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8922-3386
Chao ChengDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Guangyu TongDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7697-5029
Michael O HarhayDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Fan LiDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6183-1893

Funding

Advancing the design, analysis, and interpretation of acute respiratory distress syndrome trials using modern statistical toolsR01HL168202 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Michael Oscar Harhay, Fan Li · 2023 to 2026
$2.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL168202NHLBI NIH HHS R01-HL168202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In clinical trials, the observation of participant outcomes may frequently be hindered by death, leading to ambiguity in defining a scientifically meaningful final outcome for those who die. Principal stratification methods are valuable tools for addressing the average causal effect among always-survivors, that is, the average treatment effect among a subpopulation defined as those who would survive regardless of treatment assignment. Although robust methods for the truncation-by-death problem in two-arm clinical trials have been previously studied, their expansion to multi-arm clinical trials remains elusive. In this article, we study the identification of a class of survivor average causal effect estimands with multiple treatments under monotonicity and principal ignorability, and first propose simple weighting and regression approaches for point estimation. As a further improvement, we derive the efficient influence function to motivate doubly robust estimators for the survivor average causal effects in multi-arm clinical trials. We also propose sensitivity methods under violations of key causal assumptions. Extensive simulations are conducted to investigate the finite-sample performance of the proposed methods against the existing methods, and a real data example is used to illustrate how to operationalize the proposed estimators and the sensitivity methods in practice.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansModels, StatisticalSurvival AnalysisTreatment Outcomecausal inferencemultiple treatmentsprincipal ignorabilityprincipal stratificationsensitivity analysissurvivor average causal effect

Identifiers

PMID41363831
PMCPMC13010473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.