Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2026
Teclistamab plus Daratumumab in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma.
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05083169 (A Phase 3 Randomized Study Comparing Teclistamab in Combination With Daratumumab SC), which is not on this map. Cited by 48 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3 Randomized Study Comparing Teclistamab in Combination With Daratumumab SC (Tec-Dara) Versus Daratumumab SC, Pomalidomide, and Dexamethasone (DPd) or Daratumumab SC, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (DVd) in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- T-cell-redirecting therapies in early relapsed multiple myeloma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Pooled it
- The Changing Landscape of Maintenance Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review With Network Meta-Analysis of the European Myeloma Network (EMN).American journal of hematology · 2026Pooled it
- Non-ICANS neurologic toxicity after BCMA CAR-T therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 4630 patients with multiple myeloma.Blood advances · 2026Pooled it
- Infectious toxicities associated with bispecific antibodies and CAR-T Cells in multiple myeloma: a systematic review.Annals of hematology · 2026Pooled it
- Teclistamab-based induction treatment in transplant-eligible, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a phase 2 trial.Nature medicine · 2026Trial
- PMDA regulatory update on approval and revision of the precautions for use of anticancer drugs in Japan; tovorafenib and dordaviprone for glioma, mirvetuximab soravtansine and pembrolizumab for ovarian cancer, tislelizumab for nasopharyngeal cancer, trastuzumab deruxtecan, palbociclib and datopotamab deruxtecan for breast cancer, epcoritamab for lymphoma, teclistamab for multiple myeloma.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Dual targeting of BCMA and GPRC5D with the trispecific antibody ramantamig addresses antigenic heterogeneity in myeloma.HemaSphere · 2026Article
- More options, more questions in the management of early relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Article
- De-escalation trials in multiple myeloma: past, present and future.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Teclistamab versus lenalidomide-dexamethasone in high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma: a randomized phase 2 trial.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- A view from the periphery: trial design, commercial competition, and the access gap in multiple myeloma.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Outcomes of CAR T-cell Therapy and Bispecific Antibodies as Single-Modality and Sequential Strategies in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.Blood cancer discovery · 2026Article
- Early Treatment Failure in Patients Receiving Ciltacabtagene-Autoleucel for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.American journal of hematology · 2026Article
- The future of ciltacabtagene autoleucel in multiple myeloma has just begun.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Does ciltacabtagene autoleucel have a future in multiple myeloma?Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Comparative Efficacy of Belantamab Mafodotin in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone Versus Standards of Care in Patients With Third-Line or Later Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.American journal of hematology · 2026Article
- Bispecific antibody therapy in multiple myeloma and risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Long-term extended-interval teclistamab and talquetamab dosing without step-up dosing in previously treated multiple myeloma.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2026Article
- Advances in Oncohematology Immunotherapy: Monoclonal Antibodies and CAR T-Cell Therapies.Cells · 2026Review
- Cost-effective analysis of teclistamab and daratumumab versus ciltacabtagene autoleucel in relapsed multiple myeloma.British journal of haematology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
45 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn a phase 1-2 trial, teclistamab, a bispecific antibody targeting CD3 on T-cell surfaces and B-cell maturation antigen on myeloma cells, showed durable responses in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Daratumumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting CD38 protein, has shown survival benefit in patients with multiple myeloma.
methodsIn this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with one to three previous lines of therapy to receive combination therapy with teclistamab-daratumumab or daratumumab combined with dexamethasone plus the investigator's choice of pomalidomide (DPd) or bortezomib (DVd) - the DPd or DVd group. The primary end point was progression-free survival, as assessed by an independent review committee.
resultsA total of 587 patients underwent randomization (291 to receive teclistamab-daratumumab and 296 to receive DPd or DVd). At a median of 34.5 months, progression-free survival was significantly longer with teclistamab-daratumumab than with DPd or DVd. The estimated 36-month progression-free survival was 83.4% in the teclistamab-daratumumab group and 29.7% in the DPd or DVd group (hazard ratio, 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.12 to 0.23; P<0.001). More patients in the teclistamab-daratumumab group than in the DPd or DVd group had a complete response or better (81.8% vs. 32.1%), an overall response (89.0% vs. 75.3%), and minimal residual disease negativity (10
conclusionsIn patients with multiple myeloma who had received one to three previous lines of therapy, those in the teclistamab-daratumumab group had significantly longer progression-free survival than those in the DPd or DVd group. (Funded by Johnson & Johnson; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05083169.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.