Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41363056›Full record

ArticleBrain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland)2026

Evidence for different seeding activities of misfolded tau in classical and rapidly progressive Alzheimer's disease.

Matthias Schmitz, Katrin Thüne, Anna-Lisa Fischer, Peter Hermann, Maria Cramm, Leonie Sheila Kadel, Wiebke Möbius, Jakob Matschke, Tayyaba Saleem, Neelam Younas and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Matthias SchmitzDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Goettingen, National Reference Center for TSE, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5502-681X
Katrin ThüneDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Goettingen, National Reference Center for TSE, Göttingen, Germany.
Anna-Lisa FischerDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Goettingen, National Reference Center for TSE, Göttingen, Germany.
Peter HermannDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Goettingen, National Reference Center for TSE, Göttingen, Germany.
Maria CrammDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Goettingen, National Reference Center for TSE, Göttingen, Germany.
Leonie Sheila KadelDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Goettingen, National Reference Center for TSE, Göttingen, Germany.
Wiebke MöbiusDepartment of Neurogenetics, Electron Microscopy Unit City Campus, Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences, Göttingen, Germany.
Jakob MatschkeInstitute of Neuropathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Tayyaba SaleemDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Goettingen, National Reference Center for TSE, Göttingen, Germany.
Neelam YounasDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Goettingen, National Reference Center for TSE, Göttingen, Germany.
Saima ZafarDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Goettingen, National Reference Center for TSE, Göttingen, Germany.
Hermann AltmeppenInstitute of Neuropathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Markus GlatzelInstitute of Neuropathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Inga ZerrDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Goettingen, National Reference Center for TSE, Göttingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) may display various clinical phenotypes with different disease progressions, such as rapidly progressive Alzheimer's disease (rpAD) type. The reason for clinical heterogeneity is still unknown and not predictable. Here, we subjected frontal cortex-derived tau seeds from classical AD, rpAD patients and controls to tau real-time quaking-induced conversion (RT-QuIC) assay analysis and examined biochemical properties, toxicity, and the morphology of tau fibrils generated during the RT-QuIC applying a cell-based assay and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). We observed seeding activity of misfolded tau protein in AD patients, which was significantly higher than in control cases. Additionally, the RT-QuIC signal response revealed differences between AD cases with a classical clinical phenotype and those with a rapidly progressive course of the disease (rpAD). The RT-QuIC reaction seeded with brain from rpAD exhibited a shorter lag phase, higher area under the curve and a higher seeding end point dilution compared to classical AD, independent from the Braak stage. The cellular toxicity of thioflavin T-positive RT-QuIC products from rpAD-seeded reactions was higher compared to those seeded by classical AD and controls. Morphological characterization of brain tissue-seeded RT-QuIC end-products via TEM showed that tau fibrils derived from rpAD seeded reactions revealed subtly different morphologies compared to classical AD. The study provides evidence for the existence of different tau assemblies in AD with different progression rates. As an alternative explanation, differences in the amounts of misfolded seed or the presence of other co-factors might influence the seeding activity of tau in AD and rpAD patients.

Indexed as

Alzheimer Diseasetau ProteinsAgedAged, 80 and overBrainDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProtein FoldingMAPT protein, humantau ProteinsAlzheimer’ diseasemisfolded taurapidly progressive Alzheimer's diseaseRT‐QuIC assay

Identifiers

PMID41363056
PMCPMC13052265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.