ArticleGlobal change biology2025
Fine-Grain Data Reveal Vulnerability of Biodiversity to Climate Change.
Article in Global change biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fine-Grain Data Reveal Vulnerability of Biodiversity to Climate Change.Global change biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quantifying the impacts of ongoing climate change on biodiversity is one of the most pressing scientific challenges. Recent studies have indicated the risk of widespread range contraction and community collapse globally, but their specific interpretation and decision relevance are constrained by the coarse-grain nature of their underlying evidence. Here, using a novel climate change vulnerability metric, we demonstrate for 1804 Western Hemisphere bird species that coarse-grain estimates of climate change vulnerability show limited correspondence with those derived from biologically more relevant fine-grain data. Coarse-grain data used widely in recent assessments miss up to half of the most vulnerable species due to various degrees of underestimation and overestimation that covary with spatial autocorrelation and ecological attributes of species. As a result, the perceived vulnerability of high-biodiversity tropical regions is heavily misrepresented, while temperate regions' vulnerability profiles remain relatively unaffected by this data limitation. For example, species in the Amazon region are even more vulnerable to climate change than previously reported. These findings alter the insights of recent global work and highlight the importance of considering the grain of available evidence. Informed collection of fine-grain data combined with model-based data fusion will be key for effectively assessing and managing the effects of climate change on biodiversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.