ReviewAnaesthesiology intensive therapy2025
Cardiovascular effects of intra-abdominal hypertension: current perspectives.
Review in Anaesthesiology intensive therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Venous dimension of shock: Integrating arterial inflow and venous back-pressure in hemodynamic assessment.World journal of critical care medicine · 2026Review
- Perfusion Pressure Deficits as Early Indicators of Abdominal Compartment Syndrome After Neonatal Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Repair: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Disrupted thyroid hormone homeostasis in critical illness: clinical correlates and associations with hormone supplementation in a single-center retrospective observational study.Anaesthesiology intensive therapy · 2026Observational
- Drowning the kidneys: from fluid overload to physiology-guided fluid management in onco-hematology.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Review
- Renal consequences of complex abdominal wall reconstruction.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) are now recognized as important but often underdiagnosed contributors to cardiovascular instability in critically ill patients. Recent studies have clarified the mechanisms by which elevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) reduces venous return, raises intrathoracic pressure, and impairs both preload and contractility while increasing afterload. These pathophysiological changes can compromise organ perfusion even at modest IAP elevations, and the interplay between cardiovascular, renal, and hepatic dysfunction has led to the concept of the cardio-abdomino-renal syndrome. Advances in monitoring have shifted practice away from static pressure indices such as central venous and pulmonary artery occlusion pressures. Emerging evidence supports the use of abdominal perfusion pressure, mean perfusion pressure, and volumetric indices obtained by transpulmonary thermodilution, alongside echocardiography and ultrasound-based venous congestion assessment. These tools enable individualized resuscitation strategies, balancing fluid therapy with the risks of exacerbating IAH. The purpose of this review is to synthesize recent evidence on the cardiovascular consequences of IAH and ACS, highlight evolving monitoring techniques, and outline current approaches to management. By integrating updated concepts into clinical practice, early recognition and targeted interventions may mitigate multi-organ dysfunction and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.