ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2025
Brief Diet Screener for Assessing Adherence to the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) Diet: Development and Validation.
Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Although poor diet quality is a main risk factor for cardiovascular disease, it is rarely measured comprehensively in clinical trials using full dietary assessment tools. Objectives: This study developed a Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet screener using questions from the Stenting vs. Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis trial (SAMMPRIS) and assessed construct validity in 3 2-y cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2009-2014). Methods: Two DASH scores were created in a subset of 14,651 adults aged ≥20 with ≥1 reliable 24-h diet recall and plausible energy intakes. The validated DASH score used established methods to create a score ranging from 8 to 40. The DASH screener used 11 nonvalidated SAMMPRIS questions to create 8 components. Each component was multiplied by a weight for comparability between the scores and summed to obtain an overall score (0-100), with higher values indicating better adherence. Construct validity was examined by analyzing whether the screener score had a variable distribution, correlated with the validated score, differentiated groups with known diet quality differences, and was concordant with the validated score. Results: Participants were on average 47.6 (±16.9) y, 68% non-Hispanic White, 53% female, and with a body mass index (BMI) of 28.9 kg/m Conclusions: The brief DASH diet screener demonstrated construct validity across 4 domains. Future research is needed to better estimate salt intake and evaluate the predictive validity of the screener.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.