ArticleMultiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical
Semantic networks in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis exhibit reduced efficiency, interconnectivity, and flexibility.
Article in Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Word-finding deficits are common in persons with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (pwRRMS); this may be related to the inefficient organization of semantic information. Objective: To understand whether the semantic organization and semantic retrieval are impacted in pwRRMS. Methods: Semantic fluency data from 64 pwRRMS and 73 controls was utilized to (1) derive standard verbal fluency measures using the Semantic Network and Fluency Utility R package and (2) build semantic networks via the correlation-based network approach in the SemNet R package. Subjective word-finding concerns were assessed in a subgroup of the sample. Group differences were evaluated. Results: PwRRMS endorsed more frequent word-finding concerns. There were no differences between pwRRMS and controls on standard measures of semantic fluency. PwRRMS semantic networks exhibited differences in topology. Specifically, RRMS networks exhibited reduced efficiency, reduced interconnectivity, and reduced flexibility relative to control networks. Conclusion: Word-finding concerns are prevalent in pwRRMS; it is important to screen for and address these concerns in clinical settings. Semantic network analysis appears more sensitive in detecting semantic retrieval deficits in pwRRMS relative to standard semantic fluency metrics. Semantic network disorganization and inflexibility may partially underlie word-finding difficulty in pwRRMS. Strategies aimed at improving network structure may assist in managing these deficits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.