ReviewDrug and alcohol dependence reports2025
Multilevel determinants of medication preferences for opioid use disorder among criminal-legal-involved populations: Insights from a scoping review.
Review in Drug and alcohol dependence reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- "Convenience, Quickness, and Compassion": Experiences of People Involved in the Criminal-Legal System Accessing Medications for Opioid Use Disorder Services From a Mobile Unit in Chicago.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) hold varying perceptions of the three medications to treat OUD (MOUD). Data on these perceptions among those with criminal-legal involvement is limited. To optimize MOUD service delivery, especially in criminal-legal settings, it is essential to explore the preferences and attitudes of those with legal involvement. Methods: We conducted a scoping review of literature published via PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycInfo, and SocINDEX (January 1, 2014-September 17, 2024). Three-stage screening process was employed by two reviewers: title/abstract (n = 2085 articles), full-text (n = 88), and data extraction of 44 articles included in the final sample. Content analysis was used to understand preferences/attitudes toward MOUD and related influential factors. Results: Factors that influenced MOUD preferences/attitudes were clustered in positive (n = 39 articles; i.e., like), negative (n = 38; i.e., dislike), or mixed (n = 20; both positive and negative) valences. Methadone was the most referenced (n = 30), with more articles noting negative attitudes than positive. Fewer studies focused on oral buprenorphine (n = 18), with balanced positive and negative views. Seven articles on injectable MOUD highlighted mostly positive attitudes. Factors shaping preferences/attitudes spanned from individual to structural levels. Common factors associated with negative preferences included MOUD program rules, side or adverse effects, and drug-free ideology. Positive preferences were often engendered by flexible MOUD delivery and beliefs about MOUD. Influential factors differed by MOUD type. Conclusions: Preferences/attitudes toward MOUD among criminal-legal-involved populations are shaped by intersecting multilevel determinants and differ by MOUD type. Identified factors might serve as intervention targets to better meet individuals' needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.