ArticleGenetics in medicine open2025
A clinical algorithm to identify people with the glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase p.Val68Met variant at risk for diabetes undertreatment.
Article in Genetics in medicine open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genome sequencing of 35,024 predominantly African ancestry persons addresses gaps in genomics and healthcare.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To develop an algorithm using routine clinical laboratory measurements to identify people at risk for systematic underestimation of glycated hemoglobin because of p.Val68Met glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency. Methods: We analyzed 122,307 participants of self-identified Black race across 4 large cohorts with blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin, and red cell distribution width measurements from a single blood draw. In UK Biobank, we used recursive partitioning to train 2 models to predict possible and likely G6PD deficiency. We validated the algorithm in NIH AllofUs, Vanderbilt BioVU, and the Million Veterans Program. In the Vanderbilt Synthetic Derivative with clinical but no genetic data, we created a cohort of 48,031 participants with type 2 diabetes and no genetic data to test whether predicted risk for G6PD deficiency was associated with incident diabetic retinopathy. Results: G6PD deficiency predictions in hemizygous males showed precision/recall of 31%/81% for possible and 81%/10% for likely deficiency. In homozygous females, precision/recall was 6%/76% for possible and 34%/13% for likely deficiency. Patients with diabetes having predicted possible deficiency demonstrated 1.4-fold higher 20-year retinopathy rates (14.3% vs 11.2%, Conclusion: We report a simple clinical algorithm that enables health care systems to identify people who may benefit from G6PD genotyping and glucose-based diabetes monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.