Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41362694›Full record

ArticleiLIVER2025

Development and validation of an individualized online calculator for early mortality risk after hepatectomy among patients with HCC.

Si-Yuan Wang, Yong-Kang Diao, Yu-Ze Yang, Shuo Jin, Yong-Yi Zeng, Wei-Min Gu, Ya-Hao Zhou, Hong Wang, Ting-Hao Chen, Xian-Ming Wang and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iLIVER, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Si-Yuan WangHepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Key Laboratory of Digital Intelligence Hepatology (Ministry of Education), School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing 102218, China.
Yong-Kang DiaoDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200000, China.
Yu-Ze YangDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, General Surgery Centre, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130000, Jilin, China.
Shuo JinHepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Key Laboratory of Digital Intelligence Hepatology (Ministry of Education), School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing 102218, China.
Yong-Yi ZengDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001, Fujian, China.
Wei-Min GuThe First Department of General Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Harbin, Harbin 150000, Heilongjiang, China.
Ya-Hao ZhouDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Pu'er People's Hospital, Pu'er 665000, Yunnan, China.
Hong WangDepartment of General Surgery, Liuyang People's Hospital, Liuyang 410300, Hunan, China.
Ting-Hao ChenDepartment of General Surgery, Ziyang First People's Hospital, Ziyang 641300, Sichuan, China.
Xian-Ming WangDepartment of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan 250000, Shandong, China.
Ying-Jian LiangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150000, Heilongjiang, China.
Jie LiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fuyang People's Hospital, Fuyang 236001, Anhui, China.
Lan-Qing YaoDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200000, China.
Li-Hui GuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200000, China.
Chao LiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200000, China.
Han WuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200000, China.
Jia-Hao XuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200000, China.
Ming-Da WangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200000, China.
Yu-Chen LiDepartment of Graduate, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233030, Anhui, China.
Fu-Jie ChenDepartment of Graduate, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233030, Anhui, China.
Xue-Dong WangHepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Key Laboratory of Digital Intelligence Hepatology (Ministry of Education), School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing 102218, China.
Feng ShenDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200000, China.
Timothy M PawlikDepartment of Surgery, Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43202, USA.
Tian YangHepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Key Laboratory of Digital Intelligence Hepatology (Ministry of Education), School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing 102218, China.
Jia-Hong DongHepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Key Laboratory of Digital Intelligence Hepatology (Ministry of Education), School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing 102218, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer death globally. Despite improved surgical techniques, early post-hepatectomy mortality remains a critical concern. Current staging systems and liver function classifications fail to estimate early mortality risk to guide surgical decision-making. We aimed to develop and validate an individualized online calculator to predict early post-hepatectomy mortality for HCC. Methods: Patients undergoing curative-intent hepatectomy for HCC from 2011 to 2021 at 11 Chinese centers were included. The training cohort comprised nine centers, while the external validation cohort included two centers. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of postoperative 90-day mortality, which were incorporated into an online calculator. Discrimination was assessed using the concordance index (C-index) and calibration by graphical plots. Results: Among 4966 patients, 90-day mortality was 4.1%. Predictors of 90-day mortality included patient performance status, prothrombin time, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade, aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI), tumor burden score and gross vascular invasion. The model demonstrated excellent discrimination in training and validation (C-index 0.816 and 0.801) cohorts. The proposed model outperformed staging systems (American Joint Committee on Cancer AJCC and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer BCLC) and liver function classifications (Child-Pugh, APRI, ALBI, and Fibrosis-4 Index FIB4) ( Conclusions: An individualized online calculator was developed and validated to predict early post-hepatectomy mortality for HCC. By identifying high-risk patients, this tool may guide surgical decision-making.

Indexed as

Futile surgeryHepatectomyHepatocellular carcinomaMorbiditySurvival

Identifiers

PMID41362694
PMCPMC12681976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.