Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41362651›Full record

ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025

Computational fluid dynamics modeling and simulation of nanoparticle-tumor interaction: Systematic literature review.

Kamogelo M Mmereke, Adewale O Oladipo, Tracy Masebe, Fulufhelo J Nemavhola, Thanyani Pandelani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kamogelo M MmerekeDepartment of Mechanical, Bioresources and Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering and the Built Environment, College of Science, Engineering and Technology University of South Africa, Private Bag X6, South Africa.
Adewale O OladipoDepartment of Mechanical, Bioresources and Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering and the Built Environment, College of Science, Engineering and Technology University of South Africa, Private Bag X6, South Africa.
Tracy MasebeDepartment of Life and Consumer Sciences, College of Agriculture, Environmental Sciences, University of South Africa, Private Bag X6, South Africa.
Fulufhelo J NemavholaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, Durban University of Technology, PO Box 1334, Durban 4000, South Africa.
Thanyani PandelaniDepartment of Mechanical, Bioresources and Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering and the Built Environment, College of Science, Engineering and Technology University of South Africa, Private Bag X6, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer therapy mediated by nanoparticles is gaining recognition for shifting the paradigm of targeted and/or personalized cancer therapy. Despite the great promise, only a few nanoformulations have been clinically approved due to the complexities that limit effective and efficient nanodrug development. Moreover, the preparation of cancer nanodrug has not yet been optimized for clinical approval in patient treatment. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is a new technique that simulates and analyzes fluid flows and their interactions with surfaces using computer algorithms and numerical analysis. This simulation and modeling tool provides a distinct advantage in understanding tumor-host mechano-biology and mechanisms that help identify the main factors affecting the transport of tumor-targeting nanoagents. Taking these factors into consideration, the advent of computational fluid dynamics simulation and modeling represents a shift in the optimization of cancer nanoagents' fluidics. This review briefly introduces the fluid mechanism along with its principles and foundations relating to cancer drug delivery. Key components of tumor microenvironments relating to temperature, flow velocity, fluid pressure, and tumor rheology, as well as physicochemical properties of nanoparticles modulating fluid mechanics, were discussed. It also includes a thorough examination of the advantages and challenges of using nanoformulations such as liposomes, polymers, and extracellular matrix in exploring the progress made in computational fluid dynamics simulation to study the mechanism of nanoparticle delivery and interactions with cancerous tumors. The convergence of Machine Learning algorithms and CFD simulation in tumor-nanodrug interactions. The application of ML algorithms provides high predictive accuracy of nanodrug delivery that can benefit cancer biomedicine research by predicting how flow affects drug efficacy. The future of the ML-CFD is detailed to include imaging and 3D-CFD simulations to increase the credibility of these models and advancement to translational clinical research. This review concluded by urging collaborative efforts for a multiscale approach by biomedical engineers and scientists, as well as oncologists, to develop a modeling framework that advances precision medical care for effective cancer treatment. Standardization of the model and approaches, together with nanoparticle synthesis, is recommended to advance this research to the translational and clinical stage.

Indexed as

Cancer therapyFluid dynamicsNanoparticlePathologiesTumour

Identifiers

PMID41362651
PMCPMC12682063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.