Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41362630›Full record

ArticleImplementation research and practice

Using Incentivization as a Strategy to Improve Implementation of a Motivational Interviewing Brief Intervention for Substance Use Disorders in HIV Settings: Results of a 26-Site Parallel Groups Cluster-Randomized Type-3 Hybrid Trial.

Bryan R Garner, Stephen J Tueller, Michael Bradshaw, Kathryn J Speck, Derek D Satre, Carla Rash, Tom Donohoe, Jackie Mungo, Sarah Philbrick, Richa Ruwala and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation research and practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Bryan R GarnerDepartment of General Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7856-9403
Stephen J TuellerCenter of Justice Systems Research, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Michael BradshawCenter of Justice Systems Research, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Kathryn J SpeckUniversity of Nebraska Public Policy Center, Lincoln, NE, USA.
Derek D SatreDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Carla RashCalhoun Cardiology Center, UConn Health, Farmington, CT, USA.
Tom DonohoeDavid Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jackie MungoCenter of Justice Systems Research, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Sarah PhilbrickCenter of Justice Systems Research, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Richa RuwalaCenter of Justice Systems Research, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Mathew R RoosaRoosa Consulting, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Mark ZehnerCenter for Tobacco Research and Intervention, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
James H FordSchool of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3045-2414

Funding

The Substance Abuse Treatment to HIV care (SAT2HIV-II) ProjectR01DA052294 · NIDA · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI GARNER, BRYAN R · 2020 to 2024
$3.0M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA052294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To help improve the implementation of evidence-based substance use disorder (SUD) treatment in practice settings, the United States funds a support system called the Addiction Technology Transfer Center (ATTC) network. Prior implementation research in HIV care found the team-focused Implementation and Sustainment Facilitation (ISF) strategy as an effective addition to the ATTC's staff-focused training, feedback, and consultation (TFC) strategy. Using the ISF + TFC strategy as the control, this type-3 hybrid trial tested the effectiveness of adding a staff-focused incentivization (INC) strategy (ISF + TFC + INC vs. ISF + TFC). Staff-focused incentivization was selected because prior implementation research found it to be highly effective and cost-effective for improving SUD treatment implementation. Methods: Twenty-six HIV service organizations (HSOs), their staff participants ( Results: The addition of the INC strategy had a large and significant ( Conclusions: The addition a staff-focused INC strategy improved implementation of an evidence-based brief intervention for adults with comorbid HIV and SUD, and also reduced anxiety. To help improve the integration of evidence-based SUD services in HSOs across the United States, use of the ISF + TFC + INC strategy by the ATTC network and/or the AIDS Education and Training Center (AETC) network is recommended.

Indexed as

behavioral health servicesbehavioral health services < community basedbehavioral health workforcebuilding < capacityfacilitationHIV-AIDShybrid intervention-implementation research designimplementationintegrated caresubstance abuse treatment services < community based

Identifiers

PMID41362630
PMCPMC12681604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.