ArticlePCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences2025
High-intensity mindfulness and cognitive behavioral group therapy for social anxiety disorder: Preliminary efficacy.
Article in PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- High-intensity mindfulness and cognitive behavioral group therapy for social anxiety disorder: Preliminary efficacy.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Cost and probability biases are known to predict improvements in symptoms of social anxiety disorder (SAD). This study developed a high-intensity mindfulness and cognitive behavioral group therapy (M-CBT) program-comprising mindfulness training, psychoeducation, cognitive restructuring, exposure exercises, and group sharing-designed to reduce these biases. The intervention was delivered in a group format, and its preliminary efficacy in patients with SAD was evaluated in a pilot single-arm trial. Methods: Patients ( Results: Analyses using linear mixed-effects models revealed that high-intensity M-CBT produced improvements in SAD symptoms, cost and probability biases, depressive symptoms, subjective happiness, dispositional mindfulness, and cognitive reappraisal ( Conclusions: These findings suggest that high-intensity M-CBT can alleviate SAD symptoms and reduce cost and probability biases. Moreover, delivering M-CBT in a high-intensity format appears to be effective for individuals with SAD. Future randomized-controlled trials are warranted to more rigorously confirm these effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.