ReviewCureus2025
The Impact of Methotrexate on Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A Systematic Literature Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a long-term autoimmune disorder, continues to affect millions worldwide and is often accompanied by interstitial lung disease (ILD). This serious complication can dramatically worsen patient outcomes. Methotrexate (MTX), one of the most prescribed treatments for RA, has been widely used for its effectiveness but criticized for its potential respiratory side effects. Questions remain about whether MTX contributes to the onset or progression of ILD in this population. To explore this issue, 19 studies published between 2010 and 2025 were reviewed, covering a total of 47,271 patients with RA who had received MTX. The included studies varied in design, ranging from observational and comparative cohort analyses to experimental animal models, and were drawn from diverse geographic populations, including several from East Asia. According to the studies, five reported a link between MTX use and increased risk or worsening of RA-associated ILD (RA-ILD). The remaining 14 studies found no evidence of such an association, and some even suggested that MTX has protective properties reducing inflammation and limiting lung damage. Direct comparisons were complicated due to differences in study design, diagnostic criteria, patient demographics, and smoking status. Based on the literature collected from this review, most reports that have identified harmful effects of MTX were within the Asian population, hinting at a possible risk factor within the Asian population. The findings of these studies indicate that while concerns about MTX and ILD have some basis in literature, the collective findings fail to demonstrate a consistent or definitive risk. In fact, MTX may offer benefits for some patients when used appropriately. However, more well-controlled, multinational studies are needed to better understand how MTX interacts with lung tissue in RA and to determine which patients, if any, are at an elevated risk for developing ILD during treatment. This study aims to contribute to the evolving understanding of MTX on RA-ILD and highlights the importance of careful clinical judgment when initiating MTX therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.