Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41362538›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Peripheral Neuromodulation: Type 2 Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Secondary to an Excisional Biopsy.

João Francisco Gouveia, Marta A Caldeira, Duarte Correia

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

João Francisco GouveiaInternal Medicine, Hospital Central do Funchal, Funchal, PRT.
Marta A CaldeiraPain Management, Hospital Central do Funchal, Funchal, PRT.
Duarte CorreiaPain Medicine, Hospital Central do Funchal, Funchal, PRT.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a multifactorial and often refractory condition that involves hyperalgesia and allodynia of the extremities. Current treatments are mostly limited and short-lived; thus, different modalities of interventional pain control have come up to play a significant role in the management of CRPS. The aim of this article is to present a single case from a Multidisciplinary Pain Management Center, regarding a wireless peripheral nerve stimulation (WPNS) treatment for a type II CRPS. The European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) questionnaire was used as tool during an 18th month period follow-up. A 43-year-old healthy woman, diagnosed with ganglionar tuberculosis and a refractory type II CRPS in the right upper extremity, following an excisional biopsy. She underwent placement of a permanent electrode in the right ulnar nerve. During 18 months, a progressive reduction of pain medication and an improvement in her quality of life associated with a remarkable relief in pain, allodynia, and temperature impairment was achieved. Given its high acceptance, safety, and potential to influence neuronal plasticity, WPNS thus shows to be a promising and favorable tool in the multidisciplinary approach of CRPS.

Indexed as

complex regional pain syndromeexcisional biopsyganglionar tuberculosisneuromodulationperipheral nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID41362538
PMCPMC12682344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.