ArticleCureus2025
Assessment of Compliance With the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Protocols in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a chronic, progressive respiratory condition characterized by airflow limitation, frequent exacerbations, and substantial impact on quality of life and healthcare utilization. Effective management requires adherence to standardized international guidelines to optimize outcomes. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the management of COPD patients in accordance with Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) recommendations, with particular emphasis on the appropriateness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions relative to disease severity and risk classification. Methods This retrospective study included 350 COPD patients, confirmed by spirometry, conducted at Jinnah Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, from January 2022 to January 2025. Data were collected from hospital records, including demographics, smoking status, comorbidities, spirometry results, GOLD classification, treatment regimens, exacerbation frequency, and non-pharmacological interventions. Patients were categorized into GOLD ABE groups based on symptom burden and exacerbation history. Results The mean age of patients was 61.4 ± 9.8 years, with a male predominance of 218 (62.3%). Smoking history was present in 272 (77.7%) patients, while 64 (18.3%) reported biomass exposure. Most patients had advanced disease, with 256 (73.1%) in GOLD 3-4 stages and 173 (49.4%) classified as GOLD Group E. The mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second (%) predicted was 48.7 ± 13.4. Exacerbation burden was high, with 108 (30.9%) patients reporting ≥2 exacerbations annually and 98 (28.0%) requiring hospitalization. Pharmacological management showed that 142 (40.6%) patients received dual therapy (long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) + long-acting beta 2-agonist (LABA)) and 128 (36.6%) received triple therapy (inhaled corticosteroid or ICS + LABA + LAMA). Non-pharmacological measures were variably implemented: smoking cessation counseling was documented in 320 (91.4%) patients, though only 114 (35.6%) achieved abstinence; influenza and pneumococcal vaccination coverage was 122 (34.9%) and 88 (25.1%) patients, respectively; and pulmonary rehabilitation was accessed by 96 (27.4%). Conclusion It is concluded that while pharmacological treatment in COPD patients largely followed GOLD guidelines, significant deficiencies were observed in the adoption of non-pharmacological interventions, vaccination, and early disease detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.