ReviewCureus2025
Radiological Management of Chyle Leaks Following Oesophagectomy: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A chyle leak is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication following oesophagectomy. If untreated, it can result in hypovolaemia, malnutrition, electrolyte imbalance, and immunosuppression. Traditionally managed with surgical ligation, radiological interventions have emerged as less-invasive alternatives, though their comparative efficacy remains uncertain. This paper aims to systematically review the literature on the efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes of radiological interventions for managing chyle leaks following oesophagectomy. An electronic search of PubMed (Medline) was performed on 8th May 2024 using the terms "Chyle Leak," "Chylothorax," (accumulation of chyle within the pleural space), and "Oesophagectomy." Eligible studies included patients with chyle leak post-oesophagectomy who underwent radiological interventions such as lymphangiography, thoracic duct embolisation (TDE), or thoracic duct disruption (TDD). Outcomes assessed included technical and clinical success rates, complications, and comparisons with surgical or conservative management. Both retrospective and prospective studies, case series, and case reports were included due to the limited data available related to the condition, specifically post-oesophagectomy. Data were synthesised qualitatively. Of 448 studies identified, 38 met the inclusion criteria. The majority were retrospective reviews, case series, and case reports. Lymphangiography, with or without TDE/TDD, was the most frequently described intervention, demonstrating technical success rates exceeding 85% in most studies. Clinical resolution rates varied from 56% to 100%. Lymphangiography alone was often both diagnostic and therapeutic, with some studies reporting cure rates of up to 70%. Intranodal lymphangiography (INL) was often noted to have higher technical success than pedal lymphangiography (PL). Complications were uncommon and generally minor, though isolated cases of biliary fistula, haematoma, and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) were reported. Novel techniques such as MRI, CT-guided interventions, and lymphoscintigraphy demonstrated feasibility in case reports but lack high-powered validation. Radiological interventions, particularly lymphangiography with or without TDE/TDD, are safe, minimally invasive, and increasingly effective alternatives to surgical ligation for managing chyle leaks after oesophagectomy. While the available evidence supports their early use, the literature is limited by heterogeneity, small sample sizes, and predominance of retrospective designs. Further prospective studies and standardised reporting are required to establish radiological intervention as the gold standard of management in chyle leak and to define its role relative to surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.