ArticleCureus2025
Exploring the Psychosocial Effects of Male Infertility and the Experiences of Healthcare Workers in Fertility Centers in Osogbo, Nigeria: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInfertility is a major public health concern worldwide. There remain gaps in qualitative research specifically exploring the psychosocial experiences of men dealing with infertility. This study, therefore, explored the psychosocial and emotional effects of male infertility and examined the experiences and challenges faced by healthcare workers involved in the management of male infertility centers in Osogbo, Nigeria.
methodThe study was a qualitative study carried out among male patients attending fertility centers and health workers in Osogbo. Inclusion criteria include male patients who have been engaged in deliberate attempts to achieve pregnancy and are seeking medical assistance in the selected fertility centers, as well as health workers currently involved in infertility management for at least six months. Exclusion criteria include men and health workers who are ill or unwilling to participate. The study employed a two-stage purposive sampling approach. Data were collected through Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) among male patients and In-Depth Interviews (IDIs) with healthcare workers. Informed written consent was obtained from participants. Data from the discussions and interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using the ATLAS.ti software (Lumivero, LLC, Denver, CO, USA). Thematic analysis was employed to categorize responses into different themes.
resultAll the respondents acknowledged that male infertility can lead to psychological, emotional, and social distress for the family. Health workers encountered challenges in giving health talks, including denial and unwillingness to accept the results, feeling embarrassed, and the belief that the women should be the cause of infertility and not the male. Similarly, it is extra difficult to counsel men who have fathered a child before and are infertile.
conclusionThe findings highlight the necessity for healthcare systems to adopt comprehensive strategies that address both the medical and psychosocial aspects of male infertility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.