Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41362511›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Assessment of Dental Arch Width in Individuals With Various Growth Patterns: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Madhumitha Subramanian, Rajasekaran U B, Neetika Prabu, Arun Deepak, Vaibava Keerthana, Priyanka K, Ramkumar G

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Madhumitha SubramanianOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, RVS Dental College and Hospital, Coimbatore, IND.
Rajasekaran U BOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, RVS Dental College and Hospital, Coimbatore, IND.
Neetika PrabuOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, RVS Dental College and Hospital, Coimbatore, IND.
Arun DeepakOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, RVS Dental College and Hospital, Coimbatore, IND.
Vaibava KeerthanaOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, RVS Dental College and Hospital, Coimbatore, IND.
Priyanka KOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, RVS Dental College and Hospital, Coimbatore, IND.
Ramkumar GOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, RVS Dental College and Hospital, Coimbatore, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDental arch width plays a vital role in orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning, and post-treatment stability. Various skeletal growth patterns, hypodivergent, normodivergent, and hyperdivergent, are known to influence craniofacial morphology and dental arch dimensions. However, limited evidence exists comparing arch widths across these growth types, especially in South Indian populations.

objectivesThe objectives of this study are to assess maxillary and mandibular arch width measurements in normodivergent, hypodivergent, and hyperdivergent individuals and to compare variations in interpremolar, intermolar, premolar basal, and molar basal arch widths among these growth patterns. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 90 orthodontic patients (16-30 years) at RVS Dental College and Hospital using pretreatment casts and radiographs that were obtained from patient records for routine diagnostic and treatment purposes in the Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics. Pretreatment dental casts and corresponding lateral cephalograms were screened to identify cases fulfilling the required diagnostic and record quality standards. All data were anonymized prior to evaluation, and no direct patient contact or intervention was involved in the study. Based on cephalometric parameters (FMA, SN-GoGn, Y-axis), subjects were divided into three groups (n=30 each): normodivergent, hypodivergent, and hyperdivergent. Dental arch widths were measured on casts, including interpremolar, intermolar, premolar basal, and molar basal widths in both arches. Statistical analysis was done using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 27 (Released 2020; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States). One-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey tests was applied, and p<0.05 was considered significant.

resultsHypodivergent subjects consistently exhibited the greatest arch widths, while hyperdivergent subjects showed the narrowest. In the maxilla, the mean interpremolar width was 43.31±0.40 mm (hypodivergent), 42.81±0.39 mm (normodivergent), and 40.94±0.49 mm (hyperdivergent) (p<0.01). A similar trend was observed for intermolar, premolar basal, and molar basal widths. Mandibular arch widths followed the same pattern, with hypodivergent > normodivergent > hyperdivergent (p<0.01 for all parameters). Post hoc tests confirmed statistically significant differences across groups.

conclusionDental arch widths vary significantly with various skeletal growth patterns. Hypodivergent individuals possess the widest arches, hyperdivergent the narrowest, and normodivergent intermediate dimensions. These findings emphasize considering vertical skeletal growth in orthodontic diagnosis, archwire selection, and long-term treatment stability.

Indexed as

dental arch widthhyperdivergenthypodivergentnormodivergentorthodontic diagnosisvertical growth pattern

Identifiers

PMID41362511
PMCPMC12682311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.