Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41362500›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Ultrasound in Head and Neck Oncologic Perforator Flap Reconstruction: Recent Advancements in Preoperative Planning, Intraoperative Assessment, and Postoperative Monitoring.

Shahriar Ghadirikhorzoghi, Parmida Massahi, Niyousha Mehrnoosh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shahriar GhadirikhorzoghiPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust, Nuneaton, GBR.
Parmida MassahiBiological Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, GBR.
Niyousha MehrnooshPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Head and neck (H&N) oncologic reconstruction heavily relies on perforator flaps. Meticulous flap planning and early identification of vascular compromises are key to ensuring a high flap survival rate. Recent advancements in perioperative use of ultrasound have made it a versatile adjunct to traditional assessment methods to address their limitations. This comprehensive review aims to provide an updated narrative review of the evidence behind the current uses and frontier ultrasound modalities in the perioperative H&N oncologic flap reconstruction. The factors affecting the application of each ultrasound modality were analyzed. A comprehensive understanding of current and cutting-edge ultrasound techniques can aid in the development of institutional microsurgical assessment protocols and improve flap survival rates.

Indexed as

dopplerduplexflap monitoringfree flap reconstructionhead and neck neoplasmsmicrosurgeryoral cavity cancerperforator flapsultrasound

Identifiers

PMID41362500
PMCPMC12682315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.