Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41362499›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

An Indeterminate Choroidal Melanocytic Lesion: A Case Report.

Salah Alrashidi, Mariam Alenezi

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Salah AlrashidiOphthalmology, Farwaniya and Kuwait Sidra Hospital, Kuwait City, KWT.
Mariam AleneziOphthalmology, Farwaniya and Kuwait Sidra Hospital, Kuwait City, KWT.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Choroidal nevi are common, benign growths in the eye that are usually harmless but sometimes can present with atypical features, making them challenging to diagnose and distinguish from early-stage melanoma. In this case report, we discuss the case of a 52-year-old male patient with a history of intermittent dryness, blurriness, and floaters in his right eye. Presented to ophthalmology, incidentally revealing a suspected choroidal mass, and we document his subsequent monitoring over a four-year period. Despite the patient developing some risk factors for malignant transformation, such as subretinal fluid, the lesion thickness decreased. Interestingly, the patient's history of gastric sleeve surgery led to a decrease in vitamin B12 levels. This may have played a role in the lesion's behavior, although no direct link to malignancy progression has been established in the literature. This case demonstrates the importance of individualized care, highlighting that not all lesions with worrisome features evolve into melanoma. Close observation and long-term monitoring can be considered an effective strategy, especially in patients without risk factors. This case challenges the standard thinking on choroidal nevi and reinforces the need for personalized management plans, particularly in patients with unusual presentations.

Indexed as

choroidchoroidal melanomachoroidal neviindeterminate choroidal melanocytic lesionpigmented choroidal lesions

Identifiers

PMID41362499
PMCPMC12682316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.