ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2026
Safety of Combining Radiation Therapy and Antibody Drug Conjugates in Advanced Urothelial and Other Cancers.
Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated transcriptome analysis and machine learning to construct a homeostatic model of acetylation for bladder cancer and validate the key geneTranslational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Article
- Interactions of Antibody Drug Conjugate Anti-Tubulin and Topoisomerase I Inhibitor Payloads with Radiotherapy to Potentiate Immunotherapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) such as enfortumab vedotin and sacituzumab govitecan are novel treatments increasingly used for metastatic urothelial carcinoma. There is limited data evaluating their safety when combined with radiation therapy (RT). A bi-institutional retrospective analysis was performed to characterize toxicity in patients who received RT within 6 months of receipt of ADC. Patients were stratified by intensity of RT (higher vs lower), site of RT, and RT timing relative to ADC. One hundred three patients received 166 courses of RT (66% lower vs 34% higher intensity). In 11% of courses, RT was directed to the pelvis including the bladder. Of 77 (46%) RT courses concurrent with ADC, 7 (12%) patients experienced grade 1-2 toxicity, and 10 (13%) patients experienced grade 3-5 toxicity. All of these were attributed to known ADC toxicities, and only one was possibly influenced by the addition of RT. No patients receiving RT to the bladder experienced high-grade toxicity. This retrospective study thus found no added safety events for patients receiving RT with ADCs, even when administered concurrently. Further data to validate these findings is needed as the use of both ADCs and RT increases in patients with urothelial carcinoma.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.