ArticleCureus2025
Achieving Efficiency in Full Endoscopic Interlaminar Lumbar Decompression: A Prospective Learning-Curve Cumulative Summation Analysis and Its Impact on Patient-Reported Outcomes.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective Full endoscopic interlaminar lumbar decompression is increasingly being adopted for lumbar spinal stenosis, yet the learning curve and its clinical consequences remain uncertain. In this study, we aimed to prospectively evaluate a single surgeon's learning curve for full endoscopic interlaminar decompression. Methods We conducted a prospective, single-surgeon cohort (2018-2023) involving adults who underwent single-level full endoscopic interlaminar decompression for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis. Operative efficiency was prespecified as operative time ≤90 minutes. Learning-curve cumulative summation (LC-CUSUM) was applied to detect the transition from inadequate to adequate performance; competency was declared at the first boundary crossing. Patient-reported outcomes included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores collected at baseline and at one, three, six, and 12 months. Safety endpoints included major complications and reoperations. Results A total of 77 patients were included (mean follow-up period: 47 months). LC-CUSUM signaled efficiency competency at case 44. Mean operative time was 98.6 ± 29.0 minutes overall; 111.2 ± 32.0 minutes in the early phase group (cases 1-44) and 81.7 ± 10.1 minutes in the late phase group (cases 45-77). Both groups demonstrated significant within-group improvements in ODI and VAS at each postoperative time point; however, the magnitude of improvement did not differ between phases. Major complications (1/44 early vs. 0/33 late) and reoperations (3/44 vs 2/33) were comparable. All patients were discharged within 24 hours. Conclusions Efficiency competency was achieved without compromising patient‑reported outcomes or safety across the learning curve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.