Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41362387›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block Versus Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block (SI-FICB) for Perioperative Analgesia in Hip Fracture Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

André Fernandes, Charlotte MacAulay, Natalia Chamberlain, Chen Y Ooi, Heather Tetley, Shaul Gordon, Marcus Cox, Oliver Dixon, Hany Saleeb

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

André FernandesTrauma and Orthopedics, York and Scarborough NHS Trust, York, GBR.
Charlotte MacAulayTrauma and Orthopedics, York and Scarborough NHS Trust, York, GBR.
Natalia ChamberlainTrauma and Orthopedics, Hull York Medical School, York, GBR.
Chen Y OoiTrauma and Orthopedics, York and Scarborough NHS Trust, York, GBR.
Heather TetleyTrauma and Orthopedics, York and Scarborough NHS Trust, York, GBR.
Shaul GordonTrauma and Orthopedics, York and Scarborough NHS Trust, York, GBR.
Marcus CoxTrauma and Orthopedics, York and Scarborough NHS Trust, York, GBR.
Oliver DixonTrauma and Orthopedics, York and Scarborough NHS Trust, York, GBR.
Hany SaleebTrauma and Orthopedics, York and Scarborough NHS Trust, York, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optimal regional anesthetic technique to facilitate spinal anesthesia and early mobilization in hip fracture surgery remains uncertain. The suprainguinal fascia iliaca block (SI-FICB) aims to enhance cranial spread within the fascia iliaca plane, whereas the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block selectively targets articular branches to the anterior hip capsule with a motor-sparing intent. Randomized trials comparing the two techniques have produced heterogeneous results. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials directly comparing PENG with SI-FICB in adults (≥60 years) undergoing operative management of acute hip fracture under neuraxial anesthesia. The primary outcome was pain within 60 minutes of block administration, with secondary outcomes including pain at rest, pain on movement, time to first rescue analgesia, number of rescue doses, and 24 h opioid consumption. Continuous data were synthesized using random-effects modelling (REML) with Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman adjustment, and medians with IQRs or ranges were transformed to mean±SD using the Wan and Luo methods. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 and certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Eleven perioperative RCTs (n=1,260; PENG: 630; SI-FICB: 630) were included. PENG reduced pain at rest within 60 minutes (mean difference {MD} -0.51, 95% CI: -0.74 to -0.28; T=4.97; I²=81%) and pain on movement (MD: -0.52, 95% CI: -0.71 to -0.34; T=6.49; I²=0%). No significant differences were observed for time to first rescue (MD -0.83 h, 95% CI: -1.92 to 0.26; T=1.75; I²=95%), number of rescue doses (MD: -0.08, 95% CI: -0.46 to 0.29; T=0.71; I²=37%), or 24 h opioid consumption (MD: -15.59 mg oral morphine equivalent {OME}, 95% CI: -43.00 to 11.83; T=1.58; I²=100%). The "T" value represents the test statistic produced by the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman (HKSJ) adjustment in the random-effects model. PENG provides superior immediate analgesia for spinal positioning and early perioperative pain control compared with SI-FICB, though heterogeneity in secondary outcomes highlights the need for further standardized RCTs to clarify optimal dosing, timing, and functional endpoints.

Indexed as

elderly patientship fracturemeta-analysisneuraxial anaesthesiapericapsular nerve group block (peng)peri-operative analgesiarandomized controlled trialregional anaesthesiasupra-inguinal fascia iliaca block (si-ficb)systematic review

Identifiers

PMID41362387
PMCPMC12682211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.