ArticleBrain & spine2025
Predictive model and scoring system for delayed cerebral ischemia following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A ten-year prospective analysis of observational data.
Article in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction and verification of multimodal model for prognosis in elderly patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cerebral vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) may cause delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), a major determinant of poor outcomes. Existing predictive models lack dynamic clinical assessment, limiting timely intervention. Research question: This study aimed to develop and validate a model integrating baseline and dynamic predictors of DCI. Materials and methods: We analyzed data from 524 aSAH patients admitted between 2015 and 2024. Multivariate logistic regression identified predictors of DCI, which were incorporated into the Delayed Cerebral Ischemia Scoring System (DCISS). Model performance was internally validated. Results: DCI occurred in 157 patients (30 %). Seven independent predictors were identified: age <55 years (aOR 2.24), modified Fisher grades 3-4 (aOR 2.92), pathological blood pressure (aOR 1.76), pathological body temperature (aOR 2.38), restlessness (aOR 2.10), new neurological deficit (aOR 4.85), and Glasgow Coma Scale deterioration ≥2 points (aOR 6.33). The DCISS demonstrated excellent discrimination (AUC .89, 95 % CI .86-.92) with 88.5 % sensitivity and 82.0 % specificity at a cut-off ≥8. Risk groups were defined: low (0-3 points, 3.2 % risk), moderate (4-7, 18.5 %), high (8-13, 46.7 %), and very high (≥14, 82.5 %). Higher scores correlated with unfavorable outcomes (mRS 3-6) at discharge and 3 months (p < .001). Discussion and conclusion: The DCISS, incorporating static and dynamic parameters, offers robust prediction of DCI after aSAH. By enabling continuous risk re-stratification and individualized management, it may improve early identification of high-risk patients and reduce morbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.