Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41362330›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2025

Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation in drug-resistant epilepsy: a single-center prospective real-world study.

Jin Liao, Jingwen Zuo, Yingyue Dai, Jiaying Zhang, Qun Wang, Tao Cui, Maomao Liu, Ruijuan Lv

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jin LiaoDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University; China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, PR China.
Jingwen ZuoDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University; China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, PR China.
Yingyue DaiDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University; China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, PR China.
Jiaying ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University; China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, PR China.
Qun WangDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University; China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, PR China.
Tao CuiDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University; China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, PR China.
Maomao LiuDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University; China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, PR China.
Ruijuan LvDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University; China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, 119 South Fourth Ring West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing 100070, PR China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9927-847X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) imposes a heavy disease burden and urgently requires new, effective, and safe treatment options. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (ta-VNS) in patients with DRE. Design: Ongoing, single-center, prospective real-world study. Data sources and methods: Patients diagnosed with DRE and undergoing ta-VNS treatment at Beijing Tiantan Hospital, affiliated with Capital Medical University, were prospectively enrolled in this study between January 2023 and December 2024. The follow-up period lasted 1-2 years. The frequency of seizure reduction was assessed using seizure diaries, with a 50% decrease in seizure frequency deemed indicative of efficacy. Adverse reactions and comorbidities were recorded concurrently. All patients were maintained on stable anti-seizure medications during this study. Results: Ninety-nine patients were enrolled, among whom 16 were lost to follow-up and 18 refused follow-up. Ultimately, 65 patients were successfully followed up for analysis. The overall efficacy rate was 61.54%. Specifically, 15 patients experienced seizure reductions >90%, 8 achieved a reduction between 75% and 90%, 17 demonstrated a reduction ranging from 50% to 75%, and 1 exhibited a reduction of <50%. There were no severe adverse events, although 10 patients reported mild side effects (e.g., ear tingling and tinnitus). The efficacy rate was found to be independent of variables such as age, sex, treatment frequency, and type of epilepsy. However, it demonstrated an association with baseline seizure frequency prior to treatment and the etiology of epilepsy. Patients exhibiting a higher baseline frequency of seizures (>30 episodes per month) demonstrated significantly improved response rates, with an efficacy rate of 90.9%. Etiologies, including posttumor surgery, congenital brain dysplasia, and genetic mutations, demonstrated efficacy rates >90%. Conclusion: The efficacy of ta-VNS was 61.54% in patients with DRE. Patients with high baseline seizure frequency or identifiable etiologies tended to experience greater therapeutic benefits. Owing to its noninvasive nature and favorable safety profile, it presents a promising alternative for the management of DRE.

Indexed as

drug-resistant epilepsyneuromodulationtherapytranscutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID41362330
PMCPMC12681572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.