ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2026
Management and Outcomes of Perioperative Care of People with Diabetes across Europe (MOPED): a prospective, observational study.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Withholding or continuing glucose-lowering drugs for elective surgery in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a secondary analysis of the MOPED international, prospective, observational study.British journal of anaesthesia · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The prevalence of people with Diabetes Mellitus (DM) presenting for surgery is increasing. Guidelines on perioperative management are based on expert opinion with variability of practice likely. Our objective was to document perioperative management and 30-day outcomes of people with DM across Europe. Methods: This was a prospective, observational study involving 89 hospitals across 21 European countries, ranging from district general to tertiary referral centres. Between January 2021 and February 2024, 6126 people with confirmed DM (any type except gestational) receiving surgery of any kind requiring anaesthesia were followed for 30 days. Centres were self-selected by anaesthesiology clinicians working there, who enrolled consecutive people with DM to a locally determined target number. There was 5936 (97%) 30-day follow-up completion. The primary outcome was Days at Home at 30 Days (DAH-30). Secondary outcomes included descriptive characteristics of perioperative management, dysglycaemia and incidence of postoperative complications. Findings: There was significant variation between countries in perioperative DM management and 30-day outcomes, and variance in DAH-30 (median [range]) 26 [23-30] days, P = 0.0001). The proportion of people with DM with increased HbA1c (>69 mmol mol) was higher in T1DM compared with T2DM (n = 51, 18% vs n = 388, 7%; difference 11%, 95% CI 6-17; P = 0.002). In univariate analysis, there was an association between patients with lower HbA1c < 53 mmol mol Interpretation: There is a need to harmonise international practice to reduce variability in perioperative diabetes management and 30-day outcome. Funding: The European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESA-IC) funded administrative staff throughout the conduct of the study. The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland (CAI) and British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) partially contributed to data collection in Ireland and UK.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.