ReviewBrain, behavior and evolution2026
Differential Myeloarchitecture of Subfields of the Mammalian Auditory Cortex: A Comparative Approach.
Review in Brain, behavior and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe mammalian auditory cortex can be parcellated into multiple functional subfields, with each subfield making a distinct contribution to sound processing. For example, primary fields consisting of primary auditory cortex and anterior auditory field are the first to receive information from the thalamus, and the neurons in each of these fields have different properties in terms of latency and response duration. Non-primary auditory fields consist of secondary auditory cortex, which is involved in object recognition and emotional conditioning, while dorsal auditory fields are more responsive during locomotion and spatial tasks. What is currently unknown is how the structure of each auditory cortical subfield relates to function. Thus, it is imperative to understand how anatomical substrates that make up each field contribute to function. SUMMARY: In this review, we suggest that myelin may serve as a structural anchor for the organization of auditory cortical subfields. Myelination patterns among mammals that have been studied (primates, carnivores, rodents, and bats) show that primary auditory cortical fields are more heavily myelinated than non-primary auditory cortical fields, and upper cortical layers are less myelinated than middle and deep layers. Myelin also demonstrates experience-dependent plasticity and can be measured with a variety of invasive and noninvasive methods, and demyelination has been linked to cognitive decline. Conversely, the archicortex is lightly myelinated, and we speculate that because myelin inhibits axonal and synaptic plasticity, it would not be advantageous for the archicortex to be myelin-dense, as it has greater requirements for flexibility for learning and memory. KEY MESSAGES: This is the first review, to our knowledge, that uses a comprehensive comparative approach across mammals to determine the distribution of myelin across auditory cortical subfields. We argue that a detailed map of the myeloarchitecture of the auditory cortex must be directly aligned to the functional maps of the auditory cortex to account for individual variability and identify subfields accurately. Furthermore, myelin maps need to be compared with other anatomical markers as well to improve our understanding of the role of myelin. Finally, a detailed histological myelin map can serve as a ground truth for comparisons to noninvasive measures of myelin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.