Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41362110›Full record

ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2025

Muscle Loss in Obesity Therapy as a Therapeutic Target: Trial Design and Endpoints for Regulatory Discussions.

Stephan von Haehling, Ryosuke Sato, Henning Langer, Muhammad Shahzeb Khan, Andrew J S Coats, William Evans, Steven Heymsfield, Stefan D Anker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stephan von HaehlingDepartment of Cardiology and Pneumology, University of Göttingen Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
Ryosuke SatoDepartment of Cardiology and Pneumology, University of Göttingen Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
Henning LangerDepartment of Geriatrics and Medical Gerontology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Muhammad Shahzeb KhanBaylor Scott and White Health-The Heart Hospital, Plano, Texas, USA.
Andrew J S CoatsHeart Research Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
William EvansDepartment of Nutritional Sciences and Toxicology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.
Steven HeymsfieldPennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
Stefan D AnkerDepartment of Cardiology (CVK), German Heart Center Charité, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Society on Cachexia and Wasting Disorders (SCWD) convened a Regulatory and Trial Update Workshop in Washington, D.C., in December 2024, assembling experts from academic institutions, the pharmaceutical industry and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for focused discussions. This article summarizes the latter half of the meeting, which primarily focused on novel anti-obesity therapies based on incretin pathway alteration. Discussions highlighted the impact of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists or GLP-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (i.e., GLP-1/GIP) agonists on body composition and muscle health; the challenges of distinguishing 'true' skeletal muscle from fat-free tissue; the impact of treatment discontinuation and weight regain; advances in imaging and quantitative assessment of lean body mass; as well as insights from emerging muscle-preserving therapies (e.g., bimagrumab, pemvidutide and enobosarm). There are significant challenges in defining meaningful structural, functional and patient-reported endpoints for the use of muscle-'protective' drug therapies in the context of weight loss therapies. These also involve significant regulatory considerations for future drug development and approval pathways, for instance related to the very large number of individuals that may be considered for these therapeutic approaches as well as from the potential long (or life-long) duration of therapy considered with these drugs. Together, these discussions highlight the growing importance of integrating body composition and functional assessments in future clinical trials.

Indexed as

ObesityBody CompositionClinical Trials as TopicHumansclinical trialsdiagnosticsendpointsGLP‐1RAmuscle wastingobesitypatient reported outcomessarcopeniatreatment

Identifiers

PMID41362110
PMCPMC12686571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.