ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2025
Muscle Loss in Obesity Therapy as a Therapeutic Target: Trial Design and Endpoints for Regulatory Discussions.
Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- MASLD and sarcopenia research (2012-2025): a multi-database bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Association of sarcopenia and muscle attenuation with clinical outcomes in patients with diabetic foot: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Increasing skeletal muscle mass and strength during incretin-based weight loss.Obesity pillars · 2026Article
- Review
- Development of pharmacological interventions for the treatment of sarcopenia.Annals of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Muscle Loss in Obesity Therapy as a Therapeutic Target: Trial Design and Endpoints for Regulatory Discussions.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Society on Cachexia and Wasting Disorders (SCWD) convened a Regulatory and Trial Update Workshop in Washington, D.C., in December 2024, assembling experts from academic institutions, the pharmaceutical industry and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for focused discussions. This article summarizes the latter half of the meeting, which primarily focused on novel anti-obesity therapies based on incretin pathway alteration. Discussions highlighted the impact of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists or GLP-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (i.e., GLP-1/GIP) agonists on body composition and muscle health; the challenges of distinguishing 'true' skeletal muscle from fat-free tissue; the impact of treatment discontinuation and weight regain; advances in imaging and quantitative assessment of lean body mass; as well as insights from emerging muscle-preserving therapies (e.g., bimagrumab, pemvidutide and enobosarm). There are significant challenges in defining meaningful structural, functional and patient-reported endpoints for the use of muscle-'protective' drug therapies in the context of weight loss therapies. These also involve significant regulatory considerations for future drug development and approval pathways, for instance related to the very large number of individuals that may be considered for these therapeutic approaches as well as from the potential long (or life-long) duration of therapy considered with these drugs. Together, these discussions highlight the growing importance of integrating body composition and functional assessments in future clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.