ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2025
Determination of Ultrasound Reference Values for Diagnosing Low Muscle Mass in Older Chinese Adults.
Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Towards Rapid Bedside Detection of Sarcopenia in Cancer Patients: The Role of Rectus Femoris Muscle Ultrasonography-A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Muscle ultrasound and shear wave elastography for screening sarcopenia in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis: a prospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Dynamic changes in quadriceps and diaphragm thickness for early diagnosis of ICU-acquired weakness in elderly ICU patients: a prospective bedside ultrasound study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Correction to 'Determination of Ultrasound Reference Values for Diagnosing Low Muscle Mass in Older Chinese Adults'.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2026Article
- Determination of Ultrasound Reference Values for Diagnosing Low Muscle Mass in Older Chinese Adults.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUltrasound is a promising tool for diagnosing sarcopenia, yet standardized cut-off points and criteria are currently lacking. This study aimed to identify the optimal muscle sites and reference values for diagnosing low muscle mass in older Chinese adults using ultrasound, with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as the reference standard, and to compare its diagnostic performance with bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA).
methodsWe included 1011 participants aged over 60 years. Fat thickness (FT), muscle thickness (MT) and muscle cross-section area (CSA) at various sites, including biceps brachii, rectus abdominis, rectus femoris, vastus intermedius, vastus lateralis, vastus medialis and tibialis anterior, were assessed for participants. DXA measurements were used as the standard for defining low muscle mass. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and 10-fold cross-validation were conducted to evaluate the prediction performance of ultrasound parameters for low muscle mass. The Youden index was employed to determine optimal cut-offs, while sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were calculated to assess diagnostic performance. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to evaluate inter-rater reliability between two examiners.
resultsIn males, the biceps brachii CSA (AUC = 0.832, 95% CI: 0.793-0.870) and in females, the tibialis anterior MT (0.833, 95% CI: 0.789-0.877) demonstrated superior predictive power for low muscle mass compared with other ultrasound parameters. A biceps brachii CSA < 7.1 cm
conclusionsMuscle ultrasound demonstrated excellent inter-rater reliability and stronger associations with adverse health outcomes compared with DXA and BIA, making ultrasound a preferable tool for assessing low muscle mass. This study provides valuable reference values for ultrasound-based diagnosis of sarcopenia in older Chinese adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.