ArticleFacts, views & vision in ObGyn2025
Robotic-assisted hysterectomy using DEXTER
Article in Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Emerging robotic platforms in gynecologic surgery: a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- The dexter robotic system in gynecological surgery: preliminary clinical data from routine use.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Minimally invasive hysterectomy is increasingly performed robotically as new systems expand options and address limitations of traditional platforms, including financial, infrastructure, and workflow demands. The DEXTER Objectives: To confirm perioperative and early postoperative safety, and evaluate the clinical performance of DEXTER in hysterectomy. Methods: This prospective multicentre study included 34 patients who underwent robotic-assisted hysterectomy for benign or low-risk malignant diseases between November 2022 and November 2023. DEXTER was integrated into the surgical workflows of the four participating centres, which used their existing laparoscopic towers. Main Outcome Measures: Primary outcomes were procedural conversions and Clavien-Dindo grade III-V events up to 30 days post-surgery. Results: Median patient age was 45.5 years; median body mass index was 26.0 kg/m Conclusions: Hysterectomy assisted with DEXTER can be safely performed even in the early learning phase. DEXTER facilitated an adaptable OR workflow allowing greater flexibility in procedural approaches. Further investigation with a larger cohort and a longer follow-up is required to evaluate long-term outcomes. What is New?: First prospective multicentre study to confirm robotic-assisted hysterectomy using DEXTER is a feasible and safe approach for treating benign and low-risk malignant conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.