Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41361950›Full record

ArticlePsychological medicine2025

Impaired visuospatial working memory but preserved attentional control in bipolar disorder.

Catherine V Barnes-Scheufler, Lara Rösler, Carmen Schiweck, Benjamin Peters, Silke Matura, Jutta S Mayer, Sarah Kittel-Schneider, Michael Schaum, Andreas Reif, Michael Wibral and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Catherine V Barnes-ScheuflerDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4730-1981
Lara RöslerDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1046-1073
Carmen SchiweckDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4215-0448
Benjamin PetersInstitute of Medical Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0948-8976
Silke MaturaDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7666-9534
Jutta S MayerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5328-5893
Sarah Kittel-SchneiderDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3057-6150
Michael SchaumSystematic Mechanisms of Resilience, Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Leibniz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6589-4530
Andreas ReifDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0992-634X
Michael WibralCampus Institute for Dynamics of Biological Networks, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8010-5862
Robert A BittnerDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2021-0358

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeficits in working memory (WM) and attention have a considerable functional impact on people with bipolar disorder (PBD). Understanding the neurocognitive underpinnings of these cognitive constructs might facilitate the discovery of more effective pro-cognitive interventions. Therefore, we employed a paradigm designed for jointly studying attentional control and WM encoding.

methodsWe used a visuospatial change-detection task using four Gabor Patches with differing orientations in 63 euthymic PBD and 76 healthy controls (HCS), which investigated attentional competition during WM encoding. To manipulate bottom-up attention using stimulus salience, two Gabor patches flickered, which were designated as either targets or distractors. To manipulate top-down attention, the Gabor patches were preceded by either a predictive or a non-predictive cue for the target locations.

resultsAcross all task conditions, PBD stored significantly less information in visual WM than HCS (significant effect of group). However, we observed no significant group-by-salience or group-by-cue interactions. This indicates that impaired WM was not caused by deficits in attentional control.

conclusionsWhile WM was disturbed in PBD, attentional prioritization of salient targets and distractors, as well as the utilization of external top-down cues, were not compromised. Thus, the control of attentional selection appears to be intact at least for our specific manipulation of this cognitive construct. These findings provide valuable clues for models of WM dysfunction in PBD by suggesting that later stages of WM encoding, such as WM consolidation, are likely primarily impaired, while selective attention is not a main source of impairment.

Indexed as

AttentionBipolar DisorderMemory, Short-TermSpace PerceptionVisual PerceptionAdultCuesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adultattentionbipolar disorderworking memory

Identifiers

PMID41361950
PMCPMC13058636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.