Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41361936›Full record

ArticleClinical trials (London, England)2026

Implementing a suicide risk management protocol as part of a multisite clinical trial: Findings and lessons learned.

Erin Chase, Nicole Moreira, Brittany E Blanchard, Julien Rouvere, Lori Ferro, Jared M Bechtel, Danna L Moore, Daniel Vakoch, Keyne C Law, Jürgen Unützer and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical trials (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Erin ChaseDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2305-7304
Nicole MoreiraDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Seattle Pacific University, Seattle, WA, USA.
Brittany E BlanchardDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Julien RouvereDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Lori FerroDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jared M BechtelDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Danna L MooreSchool of Economic Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
Daniel VakochSocial and Economic Sciences Research Center, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
Keyne C LawDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Seattle Pacific University, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jürgen UnützerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
John C FortneyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

Transform Dissemination and Implementation Science in CTSA ProgramsUL1TR002319 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI John K. Amory · 2017 to 2026
$100.0M
NCCIH Supplement to NCATS/CTSA Program for KL2 Scholars - M. SoddersKL2TR002317 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Christy Michelle McKinney · 2017 to 2026
$14.5M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002317NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002319NIDA NIH HHS L30 DA056956Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute PCS-1406-19295
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough people with mental health disorders are more likely to die by suicide, individuals experiencing suicidality are frequently excluded from clinical trials of mental health treatment due to safety and liability concerns. This approach limits the generalizability of trial results and opportunities for intervention. This descriptive study aimed to report outcomes and lessons learned for a suicide risk management protocol implemented for participants reporting suicidal ideation in a comparative effectiveness clinical trial that enrolled patients screening positive for posttraumatic stress disorder or bipolar disorder. Specifically, we examined the proportion of trial participants reporting suicidal ideation, their chosen risk management plan, suicide attempts, and death by suicide. Also, because few studies have examined whether the survey modality of suicide screening impacts endorsement rates, we compared suicide ideation endorsement, patient demographics, and chosen risk management plans across phone and web survey modalities.

methodsDescriptive statistics were used to report the proportion of participants in the comparative effectiveness trial who reported suicidal ideation and activated the suicide risk management protocol, as well as the chosen risk management plans for those with active suicidal ideation. Chi-square tests of independence and Fisher's exact tests were used to test for differences in demographics, screening question responses, and chosen risk management plans, respectively, between web versus phone survey modalities among those that activated the suicide risk management protocol.

resultsOf the 1004 participants in the trial, 72% endorsed current suicidal ideation or previous suicidal behavior at baseline and activated the study's suicide risk management protocol. There were two suicide attempts in the sample (0.28%), and one of which resulted in death (0.14%). There were no statistically significant differences in SRMP activation between phone and web-based survey modalities. Among participants who activated the suicide risk management protocol and endorsed active suicidal ideation, selection of risk management plans did not vary by survey modality. Participants most frequently opted to visit their community health center (42%) or to call the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline (32%) as their chosen risk management plan. DISCUSSION: We developed and implemented the suicide risk management protocol for a multisite clinical trial enrolling patients with complex mental health conditions. Although a higher proportion of participants activated the SRMP compared to previous trials, rates of suicide attempts and suicide deaths were low. Our findings indicated no differences in positive screening rates among trial participants and no differences in safety plan selection by survey modality among participants entering the SRMP. This suggests that similar protocols may be used to screen for and manage suicidality in clinical trials, and protocols can be administered via phone and web-based surveys.

Indexed as

Bipolar DisorderRisk ManagementStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticSuicidal IdeationSuicide PreventionAdultComparative Effectiveness ResearchFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSuicideSuicide, Attemptedclinical trialscreening modalitysuicidal ideationsuicidalitySuicide risk management protocol

Identifiers

PMID41361936
PMCPMC12695019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.