SynthesisBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Diagnostic performance of machine learning and deep learning algorithms for thyroid cancer metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correction: Diagnostic performance of machine learning and deep learning algorithms for thyroid cancer metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting central lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Cervical lymph node response to 131I therapy in differentiated thyroid cancer using radiomics and clinical features.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMetastasis significantly influences prognosis in thyroid cancer, especially in papillary thyroid carcinoma. With the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) in medical diagnostics, machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models are being increasingly explored for their ability to enhance the early detection of metastatic spread. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ML and DL algorithms in detecting metastasis in thyroid cancer.
methodWe conducted a comprehensive search of scientific databases, including PubMed, IEEE, Scopus, and Web of Science, covering literature up to July 1st, 2025. This review included studies published in English that used diagnostic models for metastasis in adults with thyroid cancer. Key metrics analyzed were the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) sensitivity, specificity, and the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was quantified using I² statistics, and subgroup and moderator analyses were conducted to identify sources of variability. Risk of bias was assessed using the PROBAST tool. Bias risk and concerns were evaluated using the PROBAST checklist. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024622930).
resultsThirty-five studies encompassing 162 estimates were included. The pooled sensitivity was 0.747 (95% CI: 0.715-0.775) and specificity was 0.746 (95% CI: 0.706-0.783). The pooled DOR was 9.45 (95% CI: 7.27-12.28), indicating a strong association between AI predictions and actual metastatic status. The overall AUC-ROC was 0.818. Subgroup analysis demonstrated particularly high accuracy in models targeting distant metastasis. ML models showed slightly higher discriminative ability compared to DL models, and robust performance was observed across a variety of cancer subtypes and input data sources. Moderator analysis further confirmed the stability and adaptability of these models under different clinical and technical settings.
conclusionML and DL algorithms demonstrate favorable diagnostic performance in identifying metastasis in thyroid cancer and may serve as supportive tools in clinical decision-making. Their consistent results across different metastasis types and technical settings highlight their potential to complement existing diagnostic approaches. These findings encourage further exploration and refinement of AI-based methods for integration into routine oncologic practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.