ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
Machine learning algorithms to predict frailty in older adults in China: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Analysis by Machine Learning of Geriatric Frailty and Alzheimer's Disease Classification Using Independent Datasets.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Association of Physical Activity Levels with Severe Multimorbidity Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults: Evidence from CHARLS and a Community Sample.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Heterogeneous associations of cumulative heat exposure with cognitive decline among older Japanese adults.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- NHANES-Derived Machine Learning Model for Early Identification of Frailty Risk in CKM: Optimizing Resource Allocation Through Predictive Analytics.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the predictive value of Machine Learning (ML) for the occurrence of frailty in Chinese elderly and to identify significant factors associated with frailty.
methodsThis study utilized data from the 2020 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), focusing on 7880 elderly individuals. Six machine learning (ML) algorithms were employed: Logistic Regression (LR), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), LightGBM, and Random Forest (RF). The performance of these models was assessed using several metrics including the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, Negative Predictive Value (NPV), Positive Predictive Value (PPV), and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA). To compare the differences in ROC curves among different models, the Delong test was applied, followed by Bonferroni correction to adjust for multiple comparisons and control for Type I error. Additionally, the Brier score was used to evaluate the calibration of the prediction model.Permutation Importance and SHAP analysis were conducted to interpret feature contributions.
resultsAUC values ranged from 0.722 to 0.816, with LightGBM achieving the highest predictive performance and demonstrating the greatest net benefit across different threshold probability ranges. Feature importance analysis revealed Multimorbidity, Depression, Self-rated Health, Social Events, and Drinking as the top predictors. Permutation Importance indicated differences in ranking between LightGBM and Random Forest, with SHAP analysis showing LightGBM's ability to capture nonlinear effects, while Random Forest exhibited a more balanced global interpretation.
conclusionML algorithms can effectively predict the occurrence of frailty in Chinese elderly and identify significant factors associated with frailty. For datasets with complex feature interactions, LightGBM is preferable, while Random Forest offers improved stability and variance control. These findings support ML-based frailty screening and intervention strategies for aging populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.