Observational studyBMC surgery2025
Surgical landmarks for identification of the thoracodorsal pedicle during axillary dissection in carcinoma breast patients: a prospective observational study.
Observational study in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAxillary lymph node dissection (ALND) plays a pivotal role in breast cancer surgery, serving both staging and locoregional control. The thoracodorsal pedicle (TDP), comprising the thoracodorsal artery, vein, and nerve are critical structures encountered during ALND. Preserving the TDP is essential to minimize postoperative complications, such as impaired shoulder function and arm lymphedema, and to support successful reconstructive outcomes, particularly when utilizing the latissimus dorsi muscle for flap procedures. Accurate identification and careful preservation of the TDP especially by trainee surgeon during ALND are therefore crucial for optimizing both oncologic safety and postoperative quality of life for breast cancer patients.
methodsThis observational study included 30 female breast cancer patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy (MRM) or breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with ALND. During surgery, anatomical distances from the thoracodorsal pedicle (TDP) to key landmarks, the Lateral Thoracic Vein (LTV), and the pectoralis minor muscle were measured using vernier calipers. The clock-face orientation of the axillary vein was also employed to describe the relative position of the lateral thoracic vein (LTV) and TDP.
resultsIn all 30 patients, the lateral thoracic vein (LTV) was consistently identified at the anteroinferior aspect of the axillary vein (9 o'clock position). In contrast, the thoracodorsal pedicle (TDP) was located posterior-laterally at the 6 o'clock position. The mean distance from the TDP-axillary vein junction to the pectoralis minor (C) was 27.2 ± 10.0 mm, and the distance from the TDP -axillary vein junction to the LTV-axillary vein junction (B) was 13.1 ± 12.5 mm. The derived distance from the LTV to the pectoralis minor (A = C - B) was 14.1 ± 16.0 mm. All measurements followed a normal distribution (Shapiro-Wilk p > 0.05), and their low skewness values indicated good symmetry.
conclusionUse of LTV and pectoralis minor muscle as anatomical landmarks and clock-face orientation reliably identifies the thoracodorsal pedicle during ALND, and offer a reliable and reproducible method to locate the thoracodorsal pedicle intraoperatively, thereby improving surgical precision and minimizing risk during axillary dissection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.