ArticleBMC health services research2025
Moral distress among health care workers and decision-makers undermines tuberculosis infection screening and treatment programs for migrants in Canada: a reflexive thematic analysis.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRoutine screening of new immigrants for tuberculosis (TB) infection is being adopted or considered in high-income countries with a low burden of TB disease, such as Canada, but has major ethical implications due to the excess burden of costs and risks placed on migrants. We conducted a pragmatic qualitative study to understand health care providers’ and decision-makers’ perspectives on health care access, policy and ethics associated with screening and treating TB infection among new immigrants.
methodsBetween Aug. 2023 and Feb. 2024, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 health care providers and public health decision-makers in five Canadian cities. We constructed themes inductively via reflexive thematic analysis of transcripts, guided by pre-existing ethical concepts in public health policy related to risk imposition and the just distribution of risk.
findingsIn the current political and health care landscape, TB providers and decision-makers who work with new immigrants and TB programs expressed experiences of moral distress due to an inability to fulfil their clinical and moral duty towards new immigrants. They attributed this to disconnected health and immigration policies, as well as high degrees of uncertainty around individual and societal benefits of an immigration-based TB infection screening program. The moral distress manifests as general reluctance among health providers to pursue TB infection screening and TPT for new immigrants.
conclusionThe moral distress experienced by TB providers and decision-makers undermines the potential health impact of immigration-based screening. Our study highlights crucial faults within current health and immigration policies that fuel their distress, including the lack of: a ‘firewall’ between TB infection screening and the immigration process; facilitation of trust-building and informed decision-making; and reciprocity for the disproportionate burden of costs and risks placed on immigrants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.