SynthesisChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2025
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic third ventriculostomy with choroid plexus cauterization compared to ventriculoperitoneal shunting in pediatric hydrocephalus: a systematic review and meta-analysis with subgroup analysis.
Synthesis in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare the efficacy and safety outcomes of endoscopic third ventriculostomy with choroid plexus cauterization (ETV + CPC) and ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS) in pediatric hydrocephalus.
methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Comprehensive searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science until May 2025. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I for non-randomized studies and RoB 2 for randomized trials. Statistical analyses were conducted using RStudio (version 4.4.1).
resultsEighteen studies were included, comprising 7256 pediatric patients. ETV + CPC showed a significantly higher mortality rate after the procedure than VPS (RR = 1.14; 95% CI 1.06-1.22; p < 0.001; I
conclusionEVT + CPC is associated with a higher mortality rate compared to VPS, and shows similar rates of seizure, infection and procedural failure. These findings indicate that physicians should adopt a more cautious approach when opting for ETV + CPC; however additional RCTs are needed to address this question.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41361667What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.