ArticleNature biomedical engineering2026
Long-term unsupervised recalibration of cursor-based intracortical brain-computer interfaces using a hidden Markov model.
Article in Nature biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimal sensor set for MEG-based spontaneous and intended speech decoding toward practical communication.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- On the horizon in biomedical engineering.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intracortical brain-computer interfaces (iBCIs) require frequent recalibration to maintain robust performance due to changes in neural activity that accumulate over time, which result in periods when users cannot use their device. Here we introduce a hidden Markov model to infer which targets users are moving towards during iBCI use and we retrain the system using these inferred targets, enabling unsupervised adaptation to changing neural activity. Our approach outperforms distribution alignment methods in large-scale, closed-loop simulations over two months, as well as in a closed loop with a human iBCI user over one month. Leveraging an offline dataset spanning five years of iBCI recordings, we show how target inference recalibration methods appear capable of long-term unsupervised recalibration, whereas recently proposed data-distribution-matching approaches appear to accumulate compounding errors over time. We show offline that our approach performs well on freeform datasets of a person using a home computer with an iBCI. Our results demonstrate the use of task structure to bootstrap a noisy decoder into a highly performant one, thereby overcoming one of the major barriers to clinically translating BCIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.