ArticleNPP - digital psychiatry and neuroscience2024
Smartphone-based markers of social connectivity in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.
Article in NPP - digital psychiatry and neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smartphone Apps and Digital Tools for Managing Schizophrenia and Psychotic Disorders: A Clinical Review.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2025Review
- The intersection of structural social factors, loneliness, and social activity in individuals with psychotic disorders.Schizophrenia research · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Social isolation and social impairment are hallmarks of progression as well as predictors of relapse in psychiatric disorders. We conducted a pilot study to assess the feasibility of sensing the social activity phenotype and loneliness using active and passive markers collected using a smartphone application. The study included 9 schizophrenia and bipolar disorder patients followed in the Bipolar Longitudinal study for at least 1 month and for whom mobile communication data was collected using the Beiwe smartphone application. Subjects completed daily surveys on digital and in-person social activity, and feelings of being outgoing or lonely. We described the level and variability of social activity features. We employed k-means clustering to identify "important contacts". Further, we investigated whether social network-derived features of mobile communication are independent predictors of weekly counts of outgoing calls and text, weekly average self-reported digital social activity, and loneliness using mixed effect models and clustering with dynamic time warping distance. Subjects were followed between 5 and 208 weeks (number of days of observation = 2538). The k-means cluster analysis approach identified the number of "important contacts" among close friends and family members as reported in clinical interviews. The cluster analysis and longitudinal regression analysis indicate that the number of individuals a person communicates with on their phone is an independent predictor of perceived loneliness, with stronger evidence when "important contacts" only are included. This study provides preliminary evidence that the number of "important contacts" a person communicates with on their phone is a promising marker to capture subjects' engagement in mobile communication activity and perceived loneliness.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.