ArticleScientific reports2025
Biochemical and pharmacological characterization of propofol infusion syndrome risk markers following high-dose propofol.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Propofol infusion syndrome (PRIS) is a rare, severe complication from prolonged high-dose propofol use. Predictive biomarkers, especially in spinal surgery, remain unclear. This study aimed to biochemically and pharmacologically characterize risk markers of PRIS following high-dose propofol infusion in patients undergoing elective spinal surgery. A quasi-experimental interventional study was conducted in 2024 at Allameh Bohlool Gonabadi Hospital. Fifty-four patients aged 20-70 years scheduled for elective spinal surgery and classified as ASA physical status I or II were enrolled via convenience sampling. Baseline blood samples were collected one day prior to surgery. Propofol maintenance anesthesia were performed using standardized dosages, including continuous intravenous infusion at 10 mg/kg/h. A second blood sample was taken four hours after propofol infusion initiation. Biochemical parameters assessed included triglycerides, HDL, LDL, total cholesterol, arterial blood pH, bicarbonate ion (HCO3-), and base excess (BE). Data analysis employed paired t-tests and Pearson correlation coefficients with significance set at p < 0.05. Serum triglyceride levels increased significantly postoperatively from a mean of 153.07 mg/dL to 214.30 mg/dL (p < 0.001, CI = (- 1.19,- 0.57)). Other biochemical markers showed no statistically significant changes. Additionally, surgical duration correlated with changes in bicarbonate levels and lipid profiles. High-dose propofol infusion during elective spinal surgery was associated with a significant increase in serum triglycerides, emphasizing the potential risk of PRIS. These results underscore the importance of perioperative monitoring of lipid profiles in patients receiving high doses of propofol to enable early detection and timely intervention. A notable limitation of our study was the lack of a control group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.