Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41361561›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Simulation-assisted multimodal deep learning (Sim-MDL) fusion models for the evaluation of thermal barrier coatings using infrared thermography and Terahertz imaging.

Sruthi Krishna Kunji Purayil, Sachinlal Aroliveetil, Adarsh Chaturvedi, Krishnan Balasubramaniam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sruthi Krishna Kunji PurayilThermographic Methods, Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM), 12205, Berlin, Germany. sruthi-krishna.kp@bam.de.
Sachinlal AroliveetilCenter for Non-Destructive Evaluation, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, 600036, India.
Adarsh ChaturvediCenter for Non-Destructive Evaluation, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, 600036, India.
Krishnan BalasubramaniamCenter for Non-Destructive Evaluation, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, 600036, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thermal Barrier Coatings (TBCs) are critical for high-temperature applications, such as gas turbines and aerospace engines, protecting metallic substrates from extreme thermal stress and degradation. Accurate evaluation of TBCs is essential to improve operational efficiency, optimize predictive maintenance strategies, and extend component life. Conventional non-destructive evaluation (NDE) techniques such as infrared thermography (IRT) and terahertz (THz) imaging have been widely used for TBC inspection with limitations when used independently, including sensitivity to surface conditions, limited penetration depth mainly in multi-layer coatings. This study proposes a novel framework called simulation-assisted multimodal deep learning (Sim-MDL) that combines IRT and THz data for a comprehensive evaluation of TBCs. To generalize the study to varying thermophysical properties of TBCs, the study uses simulation-generated data along with experimental data for training deep learning models. Two deep learning frameworks based on a 1D convolutional neural networks (CNN) and a long short-term memory (LSTM) with attention were developed for the multimodal feature fusion. The IR-THz fused frameworks enable simultaneous prediction of key TBC topcoat properties including thermal conductivity, heat capacity, topcoat thickness and refractive index. Experiments were conducted on four newly coated samples topcoat thicknesses ranging from 24 to 120 μm. An attention-based LSTM model trained on both simulation and experimental data shows high prediction accuracy with MAPE values ranging from 2.06% to 4.43% for thermal conductivity, 2.05% to 3.57% for heat capacity, 11.53% to 1.75% for topcoat thickness, and 0.27% to 1.05% for refractive index, respectively, for the topcoat layers of four samples. The proposed Sim-MDL framework outperformed single-modality and conventional parameter estimation methods in accuracy and robustness, highlighting the potential of multimodal data for automated analysis of TBC in industrial settings.

Indexed as

Deep learningInfrared thermographyMultimodal fusionNon-destructive evaluation (NDE)TerahertzThermal barrier coatings (TBC)Thickness

Identifiers

PMID41361561
PMCPMC12796296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.