Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41361560›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Evaluating physics informed neural networks for water contamination risk prediction and environmental sustainability.

Saima Rashid, Husnain Abbas, Ilyas Ali, Aasma Khalid, Fekadu Tesgera Agama, M Saif Aldien

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Saima RashidDepartment of Mathematics, Government College University, 38000, Faisalabad, Pakistan. saimarashid@gcuf.edu.pk.
Husnain AbbasDepartment of Mathematics, Government College University, 38000, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Ilyas AliDepartment of Basic Sciences and Humanities, University of Engineering and Technology Lahore, Faisalabad Campus, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Aasma KhalidDepartment of Mathematics, Government College for Women University, 38000, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Fekadu Tesgera AgamaDepartment of Mathematics, Wollega University, 395, Nekemte, Ethiopia.
M Saif AldienDepartment of Mathematics, Turabah University College, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif, 21944, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growing pollution hazards in large watersheds, including Egypt's Nile River, necessitate precise and effective monitoring of water quality indices. Although considerable efforts have been made to model individual parameters such as pH, Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), Electrical Conductivity (EC) and sodium (Na[Formula: see text]), the emphasis on isolated forecasts has often overlooked their interdependencies, thereby limiting estimation accuracy and practical applicability. Conventional machine learning methodologies further compound this issue, as they frequently lack adaptability and physical interpretability, resulting in inefficiencies for sustainable water management. To address these limitations, this study develops a physics-informed neural network (PINN) framework integrated with optimization boosting techniques to jointly predict pH, TDS (mg/L), EC (μS/cm), and Na[Formula: see text] (mg/L) under three critical management strategies: industrial discharge regulation, salinity management and irrigation planning. The approach incorporates prior hydrodynamic and chemical knowledge to guide input categorization, employs adaptive weighting mechanisms to dynamically adjust feature relevance, and introduces a deep interaction module to capture intricate physicochemical couplings. A physics-constrained loss function ensures consistency with ecological processes. Field analysis revealed that while pH values (6.01-6.87) consistently met FAO standards, TDS, EC, and Na[Formula: see text] frequently exceeded permissible thresholds, particularly during the dry season. Model evaluation showed that PINN outperformed conventional optimizers, achieving [Formula: see text] values of 0.945-0.999 and RMSE between 0.012-0.088. Cross-validation further confirmed its robustness, yielding consistently low RMSE and near-unity [Formula: see text] across folds. Interpretability analysis highlighted irrigation intensity, salinity loads, and industrial effluents as the dominant drivers of water quality dynamics. Overall, the proposed PINN not only advances predictive accuracy and computational efficiency but also provides a practical framework for supporting regulatory decision-making, optimizing salinity control, and guiding sustainable irrigation planning. Ultimately, this approach offers a viable pathway for mitigating contamination risks and ensuring the long-term sustainability of the Nile River ecosystem.

Indexed as

Joint estimationMean absolute errorMean squared errorNeural network optimizationNonlinear PDESPhysics-informed neural networksWater contamination risk

Identifiers

PMID41361560
PMCPMC12774903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.