ArticleScientific reports2025
A new hybrid model for improving outlier detection using combined autoencoder and variational autoencoder.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a new hybrid model, called AVE, that integrates the strengths of Autoencoder (AE) and Variational Autoencoder (VAE) to enhance outlier detection for numerous high-dimensional datasets. The proposed architecture leverages the reconstruction strengths of AE and the regularized latent space of VAE to build a stable framework for anomaly detection. Our experimental evaluation is conducted on 16 standard test sets from various domains. The results show that the AVE architecture outperforms the standalone architecture of AE, VAE, and other compared algorithms. The AVE architecture, specifically, achieves an average precision of 0.6925 and an average ROC-AUC of 0.8902 across the subsets of this test set. It surpasses the second-best architecture by 25.99% for precision and 5.47% for ROC-AUC. It surpasses AE and VAE architectures by 67.26% and 45.44% in precision, and by 7.71% and 10.03% in ROC-AUC, respectively. It achieves the best accuracy on 12 of the 16 datasets and the optimal ROC-AUC on 5 of them. Our findings demonstrate that AVE is a more reliable and precise method for detecting outliers, particularly in complex, high-dimensional datasets, making it an effective solution for real-world applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.