ArticleScientific reports2025
Adaptive bandit algorithms increase efficiency of mobile tuberculosis screening programs.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Community-based tuberculosis screening using mobile X-ray units can effectively increase case detection rates by reducing barriers to accessing services. This study evaluated the multi-armed bandit (MAB) framework, a machine learning approach, for optimizing mobile screening locations. Using simulations, we compared two MAB algorithms-Exp3 and LinUCB-with strategies based on historical case rates and random placement. The MAB algorithms continually updated site selection based on observed screening yields, and LinUCB additionally incorporated local socioeconomic indicators associated with tuberculosis rates. Over three years, assuming two mobile units serving 95 sites in Lima, Peru, 1,000 simulations demonstrated the MAB algorithms significantly reduced the average number of screenings needed to detect one individual with tuberculosis: 112 (standard deviation [SD]: 10) for Exp3 and 79 (SD: 12) for LinUCB, versus 152 (SD: 11) for random placement and 143 (SD: 11) for historic case-rate-driven placement. LinUCB performed best, achieving a 20% increase in detection efficiency by week 16 and 50% by week 40 compared to case-rate-driven placement. Overall, both MAB algorithms improved tuberculosis screening yields, emphasizing the value of data-driven approaches for optimizing mobile screening interventions. Incorporating adaptive models into screening programs may enhance targeting efficiency and offers a promising direction for policymakers and implementers seeking to optimize resource allocation in high-burden setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.