Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41361497›Full record

ArticleInjury epidemiology2025

Approval of extreme right-wing organizations and social movements and support for political violence in the United States: findings from a nationally representative survey.

Garen J Wintemute, Bradley Velasquez, Yueju Li, Elizabeth A Tomsich, Paul M Reeping, Daniel Tancredi, Sonia L Robinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Injury epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Garen J WintemuteDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, UC Davis, 2221 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA, 95814, USA. gjwintemute@ucdavis.edu.
Bradley VelasquezDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, UC Davis, 2221 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA, 95814, USA.
Yueju LiDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Elizabeth A TomsichDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, UC Davis, 2221 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA, 95814, USA.
Paul M ReepingDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, UC Davis, 2221 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA, 95814, USA.
Daniel TancrediDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, UC Davis, 2221 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA, 95814, USA.
Sonia L RobinsonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, UC Davis, 2221 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA, 95814, USA.

Funding

The California Wellness Foundation 20-25584The Heising-Simons Foundation 2019-1728The Joyce Foundation SG-22-45737
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConcern for political violence in the United States remains high. The limited information available indicates that approval of specific extreme right-wing organizations and social movements is associated with support for and willingness to engage in political violence, but systematic data are lacking. The study objective is to quantify those associations at the individual level in a nationally representative survey sample.

methodsCross-sectional analysis from Wave 1 of a nationally representative survey of members of the Ipsos KnowledgePanel, conducted May-June 2022. The exposure is approval (categorized from non-approval to strong approval) of 8 named organizations and social movements, considered individually and together. Principal outcomes are justification for political violence, in general and to advance specific political objectives; willingness to engage in political violence, by type of violence and target population; and expectation of firearm use in political violence. Outcomes are expressed as weighted percentages and adjusted prevalence differences (aPDs, expressed in absolute percentage points (pp)).

resultsThe completion rate was 55.8%; there were 8,620 respondents. After weighting, 50.6% of respondents (95% CI 49.4%, 51.7%) were female, and 62.6% (95% CI 61.4%, 63.9%) were white, non-Hispanic; the weighted mean (SD) age was 48.4 (18.0) years. Few respondents (1.4%, 95% CI 1.0%, 1.8%) strongly approved of the organizations and movements considered together. However, strong approvers were much more likely than non-approvers to consider violence usually or always justified to advance specific political objectives and much more willing to engage in political violence; aPDs frequently exceeded 30% points. To advance a political objective, 29.1% (95% CI 18.4%, 39.8%) of strong approvers were very or completely willing to kill someone, and 18.1% (95% CI 8.5%, 27.7%) thought it very or extremely likely that they would shoot someone; prevalences among non-approvers were 0.9% (95% CI 0.5%, 1.2%) and 0.6% (95% CI 0.3%, 0.9%), respectively.

conclusionsApproval of extreme right-wing organizations and social movements is strongly associated with support for and willingness to engage in political violence. Given continued concern for political violence in the United States and the new possibility that such individuals might join federal law enforcement in large numbers, focused prevention measures are urgently needed.

Indexed as

AuthoritarianismBoogalooChristian nationalismCivil warDomestic violent extremismFirearm violenceMilitiaOath keepersPolitical violenceProud boysQAnonThree percentersWhite supremacy

Identifiers

PMID41361497
PMCPMC12683887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.